Evidence × Personalization × Action.
Every option we surface for discussion with your physicians is weighed against three questions. The three questions are the rubric; a nine-stage workflow is how we apply it to your case.
Organize & orient → analyze & plan → continue.
The Ternary Method runs on organized inputs. A Precision Deep Dive does its best work when the case file is already assembled, the medications and supplements are already normalized, and the obvious gaps in the record have already been identified — so the analysis can spend its time on synthesis rather than on cleanup.
That’s what Ternary Launchpad produces. It’s the $400 entry-tier engagement that turns a scattered medical history into the organized starting point the Deep Dive then analyzes. Launchpad organizes and orients; the Deep Dive analyzes and plans; Advisory continues.
Most medical advice fails one of three tests.
Either the evidence is weak, or it doesn’t actually fit the individual in front of you, or it can’t realistically be acted on given the person’s access, finances, or life. The Ternary Method makes those failure modes visible before the advice is given, not after.
Does the published literature, current clinical guidance, or accumulated clinical experience support this option for your condition and your context?
- —Strong — randomized-trial evidence in your exact condition
- —Mixed — a credible mechanism plus observational data
- —Thin — anecdote alone
Does this option fit you — your biology, your genetics, your comorbidities, your preferences, your constraints? An option with strong evidence can still be a poor fit if your profile argues against it.
- —Strong fit — specifically indicated for your phenotype and genetics
- —Reasonable fit — generally appropriate, nothing arguing against it
- —Poor fit — contraindicated or mismatched to your profile
Can you actually do this? Is the specialist available? Is the drug covered? Does the timing work with your life? A brilliant option that requires six months of wait time may be out of reach when a good option is available now.
- —Within reach — accessible, covered, timely
- —Reachable with effort — available, but with trade-offs or delay
- —Out of reach — structurally unavailable in your situation
Three tests every option has to pass.
Every option on the table — a drug, a surgery, a supplement, a lifestyle change, a monitoring strategy — is weighed against the same three questions: Is the evidence there? Does it fit you? Can you actually act on it? The options that hold up on all three become the spine of your plan, sequenced so the steps that have to come first do. The ones that don’t, we still show you, with our reasoning — because what we set aside, and why, is part of an honest deliverable.
The three questions are the discipline. The judgment behind every answer is ours — read from your records directly, by the two of us.
The options that hold up across all three tests. These anchor your plan, with specific next steps and the order to take them in.
Strong on the research, with one open question — a matter of fit, access, or your own preference. We flag them for the conversation, not the default plan.
Options you may have read about or been offered elsewhere. We tell you what we found and why they're not in your core plan. Transparency about what we considered is part of the work.
An option with strong published evidence can still fall out of your plan — if it doesn’t fit your biology, or if the only specialist who delivers it has a year-long wait. That’s why we weigh all three, never evidence alone.
A structured pipeline, not a custom one.
A Precision Deep Dive typically runs Day 0 through Day 55 — from first application through 30 days of post-delivery execution support. Each stage has a defined input, output, time budget, and contribution to our proprietary data foundation. Stage 02 (intake) runs against the standardized Ternary Core Dataset.
Short application screened for fit, not just willingness to pay. Condition, stage of journey, data availability, goals, realistic expectations.
Structured questionnaire. Records, labs, imaging, and optional genome upload. Kickoff call to build the timeline narrative.
Unstructured inputs converted to the Ternary case schema. Hundreds of fields per case — symptoms coded to a controlled vocabulary, labs normalized to reference ranges, genetic variants flagged against a curated relevance list.
The Ternary Signal Library applied to your case. Abnormal labs, genetic flags, comorbidity patterns, lifestyle factors ranked by likely relevance and modifiability.
Structured literature review per signal and for your primary condition. What current guidance says, what recent literature is showing, where evidence is strong vs. thin.
The option space — surgical, medical, lifestyle, emerging pharmacological, monitoring. Each pathway mapped to specialists, institutions, and decision points.
Every option weighed on the three axes (Evidence × Personalization × Action), then prioritized and sequenced with prerequisite logic so each step unblocks the next.
Draft reviewed internally by the principals. Findings call, walk through the plan, adjust for your priorities and constraints.
30 days of asynchronous follow-up. Weekly check-ins. Specialist appointment preparation. Post-consultation debriefs. Labs and imaging interpreted as they arrive.
Standardized inputs, in. Hand-read insight, out.
The same Core Panel, the same wearable metrics, the same structured intake for every client — so nothing gets lost and every case is comparable. Then the two of us work your case by hand. The data is what makes the patterns visible; deciding what they mean for your plan is research we do ourselves.
Every engagement structured and indexed — condition, profile, interventions, outcomes.
A controlled vocabulary of lab patterns, variants, symptom clusters, and comorbidity combinations, each mapped to how much it matters for specific conditions.
A living document per condition, tracking guidelines, recent literature, and evidence grades per intervention.
A curated network of clinicians and institutions — who's known for what, what they've actually delivered, who's accessible.
What happened to clients 3, 6, 12 months after engagement. Which recommendations correlated with improvement.
Clear lines.
Ternary Health is not a medical practice. We don't prescribe, treat, or replace your physicians. We build the integrated view; your doctors make clinical decisions.
Every claim in your report is sourced and graded. Where the literature is uncertain, we say so. Where specialists disagree, we surface the disagreement rather than hide it.
Deliverables are structured for the exam room — compact enough for a busy specialist to absorb, deep enough to support the conversation that follows.
Ready to begin?
We accept a small number of cases each month and decline applications we can’t meaningfully advance.